Commenter MajorSeventh links** us to a curious interlude at a homosexual “pride” event in South Korea, in which the participants apparently spouted off an a capella version of A Pink’s monumental megahit “LUV” in supposed defense of their lifestyle.
Pearls before swine, so I won’t linger over this outrage. I do wonder, though, if the sodomtivists were, in the typically dreary fashion of the day, appropriating the song because it carries the word “love”–there being an enormouf*** faith in the Westernized world that “love” is an argument for everything–, or whether they were consciously abusing A Pink because they are the emblem of everything Good, Great, and Pure.
Possibly only the former, because the article at asia(n?)junkie only confirms what I’ve long noted about Western reaction to A Pink, which is that they totally don’t get them. I doubt Westerners in general (in their present degraded condition) could get A Pink; but certainly the fags and fag-hags who account themselves the poptimist avant-garde and scribble about K-pop from the United States of Gommorah do not get A Pink at all. Which is why it’s no surprise to me that some of them seemed even embarrassed about their fellow rainbowites appropriating a song they regard as “””basic”””.
How people can be so musically tone-deaf is beyond me; but if you read these people at all you almost immediately realize that all they care for in K-pop is Hyuna and Lee Hyori and Hello Venus doing “Wiggle Wiggle” and, in the absence of overt sexuality or trashiness, anything they can at least “ship” (preferably in gaywad style) or else turn into kitsch or camp. They might approve of 4Minute overall, but they’ll relentlessly trash Jihyun, who is classically beautiful but not “fierce” and therefore contemned. These same idiots doubtless think Beyoncé records are better than Pet Sounds, so it’s pointless to attempt to engage them on any subject relating to Absolute Music. All their musical appreciation amounts to is throwing around queerific patois like “slay”.
I’m reminded of the comments at youtube for BESTie’s “Excuse Me” mv, in which, at the end, Haeryung and the girls discover, by way of their magic X-ray specs, that all the cute guys around them are gaywads.
As portrayed in the video, I’d say the attitude toward homosexuality is at least mildly contemptuous; but regardless, in the comments many viewers fell all over themselves trying to argue that the video was blahblah promoting social justice yaddayadda “make gay ok” [NB: Amazing they think that propaganda brainwashing public opinion constitutes settling a moral issue]. For my part, I’d just as soon K-pop avoid anything hinting at homosexuality, but since that’s not completely the case, the next best thing would be for K-artists to come out of the closet as patriotic reactionaries eager to close Korea off from foreigners and foreign devil influence.
If Trump can do for America what Putin does for Russia, perhaps– God willing– the awful tide of Davos-mandated soy and circuses worldwide can be reversed. Northeast Asia may already be the destined bastion against Global Gramscianism’s horror, but it’ll be a happy day when those governments come out publicly and absolve themselves of the American military, the American financial system, and the whole deadly gamut of false works that floods from Hollywood, Manhattan, and Harvard. And yes, that includes giving the ESL shock troops their marching orders homeward– no more pushing sentimental SJW garbage down the throats of the Yellow Goy, a**holes. If Eric and I have to marry buck-toothed brunette 6s from Appalachia, so be it. I want Korea pure– and hopefully, a purer world entire.
While Western liberals and, sadly, Westernized Asian-Americans try to cajole and hustle conservative Korea (they say that like it’s a bad thing) into conformity with their EUSSA Judeo-Jaffa Memo Babylon Antichrist Superstar One World Whore-ershow [Ed.: You forgot the coconut!], America and the EU continue to circle the drain of economic crash, Divine Retribution, and a Cold Civil War that’s getting hotter.
As to the homos among us, I recall the sentiment of beloved right-wing gay icon BigGaySteve, the famous Vox Day commenter, who once paraphrased an old liturgy along these lines:
“First they came for the blacks, and because I was not black, I did nothing.
“Then they came for the Jews, and because I was not a Jew, I did nothing.
“Then they stopped coming after people, because once they got rid of the blacks and the Jews, they realized all their problems were pretty much solved.”
For my part, I’m perfectly willing to keep my nose out of other people’s anuses, depilated or otherwise, and leave that sort of thing up to God. Except that I should note this means: A) rolling back the legal and moral monstrosity of homogamy utterly; B) keeping all homosexual propaganda, including heartwarming tales of “diverse families” and the stork who brought gay mens’ “sons” from Somalia, away from children; C) banning “Pride Parades”; D) banning gay “adoption”; E) banning medically-facilitated surrogacy (just throwing that one in there, in case: now, if you want to keep a concubine under your roof, I guess that’s your heartache, but don’t expect me to validate forcing bastard spawn upon your legitimate children); F) legalizing conversion therapy; and indeed G) encouraging homosexuals to at least try straight sex in the hopes of siring (healthy, I hope) biological children and decreasing the same-sex notch count.
I add that last because, in a sort of reactionary appropriation of Camille Paglia (who supports the voluntary use of conversion therapy), I think it’s sensible to argue that, by creating a militant culture of “heteronormativity”, we promote the real happiness of homosexuals too (not that the “happiness” of a minority of 1.5% of people should count anyway). If a gay man who otherwise would f**k 17,000 men and leave no children behind to wipe his (miraculously plague-free) ass when he’s old could instead be encouraged to sire two children upon a fondly-regarded beard and decrease his anal notch-count by an order of magnitude, he would thereby f**k only 1,700 same-sex asses and have two children to tolerate him on Sunday afternoons at the nursing home. A good trade?
I humbly submit that exchanging the amyl nitrate(-trite?)-clouded memories of 15,300 momentary Butt Buddies for the real live presence of two honest-to-god offspring is a very positive utilitarian tradeoff– to say nothing of the obvious transcendent superiority of having children instead of fleeting “pleasures”. If you want homosexual persons to be at least tolerably happy-ish, then you should support militant heterosexual supremacism so gays can at least enjoy a tiny bit of the real happiness reserved for the vast majority of (healthy, normal) mankind.
PS.: Of course, I’m diplomatically eliding over the fact that gay fathers are three times as likely to molest their own children as straight men, and lesbians are ten times more likely to molest their own children than straight women. I said I’d leave it up to God– but if homosexuality really is caused by some kind of in utero virus, then we’re going to wipe that crap out. At which point I expect gay child abuse to go through the roof because, like David Bowie in The Hunger, gays will fanatically prey upon children, desperately trying to keep their “community” going and supplied with willing flesh. But then, there’s all too much reason to believe that’s how they roll already . . . .
** Curiously, after I read it the link doesn’t work for me.
***Fweudian slisp, but I fought I’d keep it since iss funny